Islamic state

Islam full life provisions

Our responsibility is to say no to anyone. 

A K Azad Bashar, shorif99

"It is not necessary for the state to have Islam," believes Kufri.

Islam is the perfect way of life. So there is no direction or division of human life, the direction of which is not in Islam. It is forbidden to believe that it is forbidden.

It is good to note that from Pak house to Parliament, our full life will be operated under the laws of Allah from person to international stage.

It is not limited to the announcement of the Quran, namaz, zakat, fasting and hajj, but Islam should be fulfilled in full life (Surah Baqarah-208).

People will follow the laws of Allah, and the people and society will follow the laws of the people, believe that shirk (Surah Anaam 57).

And the society and the country will go on in accordance with the law of God, when there will be victory of religion in the country. To win the religion was the main goal of the Prophethood of the Prophet (peace be on him).

In Saudi Arabia, the religion is Alhamdulillah, so if the Azan is closed the shop is closed. And the shops under the bottom of the National Mosque of Bangladesh, the Jamaat is running in the second floor.

In Saudi, women do not go out without screen, and we do not get the environment to go out of the street due to uncommitted women in this country.

In Saudi, a thief was cut off, and our country was made a thief as a minister.

In Saudi, drinking alcohol is whipped, and our country is a vendor businessman.

Do not you want to see this country in Saudi Arabia like Bidi environment?

Will it ever be possible if there is no Islam in the state?

Why are you opposing the establishment of religion as a religious scholar, and many people have been unemployed? How are you muslim

You say that the Prophet, the Companions did not do it.

I want to tell you, did they give the state power to Tagut?

Was not the Prophet, the head of the state of Medina? Abu Bakr, in the era of Umar, the law used to run the state, not of God or the tagat?

I do not understand what might be the reason for your opposition even after knowing these.

Only Usilah wants to know, never said, will not be through democracy, and never said, it is not in the Qur'an and Hadith, it is said, before it means Tauhid, then the religion is established. How many more Ushila Going back, the goal is the same.

What is your loss if Islam is in power in the state? If you do not work, you can not support us. Instead of opposing the opposite, why?

Those who want to take power in the state of Islam, they are very guilty in your eyes.

Writing books against them, giving a speech, listening to their Waj's video for the purpose of searching for their faults, threatening to find out more what the fault is available in the future. Wonderful

We are also shirk-bidad, so you too. But the difference is that we do not agree with any law other than Allah, and you are stately against the rule of Allah. Angry? No, it's not my talk, it's from your written books and statements.

Muhtaram Muzaffar bin Muhsin Bhai said - It is the state of Islam whether it came from Shi'ah's thinking.

Muhtaram Madani Bhai said, the work of Islam in the state of Islam, the companions did not do the Prophet.

I can swear by the promise of Allah and I love you because of your anti-shirk anti-infidelity. But in the power of the state, your role in the issue of Islam against Tagut, against Islam, is against Islam.

However, how can we take Islam to power in the state, in a democratic way? Or is there any other place? It can be discussed, reviewed, consulted. Disagreements can happen.

But there is no reason to make any difference in the matter "There is no law for anyone other than Allah" in all places of life.

B, dr, we will not be blind supporters. Nobody is beyond the mistakes. I say the wrong one wrong, the right one will say right. And if you see the language of comments, you feel like believing. So comment in modest language.

Dr. Mufti Abul Kalam Azad Bashar